Let HP & BB Buy Some Of This Crap!

Let Paulson And Bernanke Buy Some Of This Crap

By Brady Willett, Fallstreet.com | 24 September 2008

The Treasury Secretary Paulson and Fed Chairman Bernanke bailout plan calls for $700 billion in taxpayer funds to be used to purchase assets that will in all likelihood be worth considerably less in the future. As for the contention that the assets to be purchased could be worth more in the future than prices paid today, if there was any validity to this speculation the bailout plan in question would not be required as the assets in question would have already found more than one ready buyer.

Before continuing the above point needs to be stressed. To be sure, there are willing and able distressed assets investors roaming the markets (i.e. Buffett took a position in Goldman yesterday). However, what these investors have concluded is that a lot of mortgage based securities are toxic in that they can not be accurately priced by any conceivable buy-and-hold model and/or that they are still being too richly valued by their owners.

Even to suggest that the Treasury is going to be able to employ someone able to successfully accomplish what many well healed foreign and domestic distressed interests have not— is shameful. In other words, the bailout plan, at best, is an attempt to make a market based upon the grand speculation that such an action will 'unfreeze' markets and not prove overly detrimental to the taxpayer. [[With all of the miscreants magically 'cleansed' and 'born again', and ready to start in all over again.: normxxx]]

With that out of the way, the sad truth is that Paulson and Bernanke have come to the crossroads of common sense. They both know that the free market alternative, while preferable, would see many more massive blow-ups in the future than we have already had and that following their current policies of 'selective' rescues would simply compel the need for still more bailouts [[as the dominoes fall… : normxxx]]. So, rather than further disgrace the sanctity of 'free market idealism' and watch investor confidence crumble with the day-by-day, largely ad hoc bailout proceedings, they instead opted for the Mother Of All Bailouts. In this regard, they are trying to act à la Greenspan, or in a ‘preemptive’ manner.

"I have never been a proponent of intervention… There is no way to stabilize the markets and deal with [this] situation other than through government intervention." Paulson.

But while the preemptive action plan is understandable and perhaps even necessary, temporarily, to restore functionality in the financial mess that is the U.S. markets, that Bernanke and Paulson took turns trying to spin the bailout in an optimistic light yesterday is ridiculous. The $700 billion bailout is a desperate plan that could fail miserably, permanently damage the U.S.’s financial standing, and leave the U.S. taxpayer holding the bag. The way Paulson and Bernanke talk you would think that taxpayers should be lining up to donate more than $700 billion.

When Life Hands You Lemons Try To Make Lemonade

When asked by Sen. Jon Tester yesterday if the $700 billion bailout ‘could potentially affect the credit rating of the U.S. Treasury’, Paulson avoided the question, adding that the $700 billion wasn’t necessarily an expenditure. Astonishingly, Mr. Paulson also said "This is all about the American taxpayer. That is all we care about…" Buying junk with taxpayer dollars shows that you care about taxpayers? Setting an artificial price for toxic assets is not expenditure?

"This is not expenditure." Paulson.
"This is not expenditure." Bernanke.

The initial Paulson/Bernanke bailout plan was all of three pages long and was franticly cooked-up as the markets were collapsing. It reads like it was put together by a bunch of tyrannical toddlers playing with crayons. Are we really to believe given the circumstances that this plan represents an opportunity and not an expenditure for U.S. taxpayers?

"This is not an expenditure of $700 billion. This is a purchase of assets, and if auctions are done properly, evaluations are done properly, the American taxpayer will get a good value for his or her money." Bernanke.

Good value? Well Mr. Bernanke, if buying the garbage stinking up the American financial system is such an opportunity why don’t you partake in this adventure with some of your own capital? (I am quite sure the public would not mind if a few 'Chinese walls' were broken down to allow Hank and Ben to invest some of their own funds in this scheme.) Why not call the new plan ‘Opportunity USA’, get the 'best minds' in the industry to run the entity, and entice Greenspan, Bush, Gross, and other proponents of the plan to invest some of their own funds. After all, under such a scenario it is not inconceivable that taxpayers dollars would start voluntarily rolling in to also invest.

But alas, the chain of events to create ‘Opportunity USA’ is exactly how the free market works, and the free market has already spoken and told us that the crap to be so graciously purchased by the U.S. taxpayer is indeed— CRAP.

Unable To Make Lemonade? Try To Hike Up The Price of Lemons.

By Bernanke and Paulson’s own admission the plan in question would 'not be successful' if assets were purchased at ‘fire-sale’ prices. [[Indeed, there must be enough there to 'pay off' those erstwhile 'captains of industry' and their 'golden parachutes'!: normxxx]] I am sure that taxpayers (the investor’s fronting this endeavor) would think much differently. Which brings us to the crux of the situation: you can not protect the financial system and the taxpayer at the same time. You focus on one— in this case the ‘system’— at the expense of the other.

"Just as when you sell a painting at Sotheby’s, nobody knows what its worth until the auction is over. Then people know what its worth. I think the same thing here…" Bernanke.

Some of the securities auctions this year have been canceled, others have been devoid of buyers, and still others generated bids for pennies on the dollar. But pay no attention to these other auctions, because apparently it takes Bernanke, Paulson, and $700 billion to tell us what many securities are really worth.

ߧ

Normxxx    
______________

The contents of any third-party letters/reports above do not necessarily reflect the opinions or viewpoint of normxxx. They are provided for informational/educational purposes only.

The content of any message or post by normxxx anywhere on this site is not to be construed as constituting market or investment advice. Such is intended for educational purposes only. Individuals should always consult with their own advisors for specific investment advice.