Tuesday, September 7, 2010

Hail To The Chief

Hail To The Chief

By Lawrence G. Mcmillan | 6 September 2010

MORRISTOWN, N.J. (MarketWatch)— The "Presidential Cycle" is a seasonal tendency that has a strong track record. Simply stated, the Presidential Cycle includes a major market bottom in the mid-year between presidential elections— which is this year. This indicator usually receives a good amount of publicity in the year that it predicts a buy signal. However, this year, I haven't seen any articles on the subject— save for the annual mention in "The Stock Trader's Almanac."

Simply stated, the theory is that the market follows a four-year cycle that roughly corresponds to the cycle of U.S. presidential elections. The technical part of the system is its seasonality, but there are also fundamental reasons why it seems to work. The market usually tops in the year after the presidential election, as the new president prepares to take on any negative aspects of administering early in his term (the reasoning being that, four years later, most voters will have forgotten the negative things).

The market then declines into the second year of his term— the mid-year between elections. Sometime during that year (often, in the fall and in October, in particular), the market bottoms and then rallies through the third and fourth years, as the economic "pump" is primed in order to make things prosperous for as many as possible, prior to the next election. This is, of course, just a generality, but the Cycle has a strong track record, especially the part about bottoming in the mid-year between elections.

There is ample evidence of strong market bottoms in the second year. Massive bear markets bottomed in 1970, 1974 and 2002. There were also severe corrections in 1938 (as we well know from our June Trading Strategies article on that subject), 1942, 1946, 1962, 1966, 1978, 1982, 1990, 1994 and 1998 that bottomed in the mid-year and led to very strong rallies. We generally use the Standard & Poor 500 Index (SPX 1,105) to measure "the market."

As for the most recent Presidential Cycle bottom, in 2006, there was a sharp correction in May and June (from SPX 1,325 to 1,220— about 9%). There was great debate after that, as the market rallied into the fall, about whether or not the June bottom was the bottom. It was, but since it didn't conform to what many had hoped would be an October bottom, the Presidential Cycle was discredited in some articles and by some media types.

In reality, the bottoms have come at various points in the year. For the years listed above, the bottoms occurred in the months as shown in the table (in some years, such as 2002, there were double bottoms). As you can see, the monthly distribution is quite spread out.

Counting the double bottoms, there are 18 months listed in the table. Of those 18, only seven occurred in the fall of the year. Six occurred in the summer, and the remaining five were between February and May. October and August tied as the most frequent months, albeit at a lowly three times each.

Now, we are currently entering September of 2010, and if the bottom is in, it was in late May— at about 1,040 on the SPX. So we certainly haven't missed it by much, as SPX is trading below 1,070 as of this writing. In years where there was a second decline (1974, 1994, 1998 and 2002), the second decline was more or less a retest of the first decline. In other words, a "W" bottom was eventually formed.

So buying near the first bottom wasn't a major mistake— it was just a little early. That would augur for buying the market near SPX 1,020, should it slip that low again. Also, it should be noted that October has more bottoms than September, so if a decline gets underway in September, it might easily continue into October.

But we don't have to rely on such vagaries, since we have other indicators to rely on as things unfold. In particular, for a bottom of this magnitude, it would be considered at least an intermediate-term buy signal. Thus, we can use the equity-only put-call ratios, market breadth indicators, and the trend of volatility as guides in identifying when the bottom is in.

So far, those haven't turned bullish yet, but such buy signals might not be far away. The fact that they could also be coinciding with the powerful Presidential Cycle makes me think that the next set of buy signals should be heavily respected when they occur. In summary, if this year is to be typical, an intermediate-term market bottom is due to form in the remaining four months. History indicates that it will likely be in September or October.

Lawrence G. McMillan is president of McMillan Analysis Corp. He is an experienced trader and money manager and is the author of the best-selling book, "Options as a Strategic Investment" and editor of the "MarketWatch Option Trader" newsletter.



The contents of any third-party letters/reports above do not necessarily reflect the opinions or viewpoint of normxxx. They are provided for informational/educational purposes only.

The content of any message or post by normxxx anywhere on this site is not to be construed as constituting market or investment advice. Such is intended for educational purposes only. Individuals should always consult with their own advisors for specific investment advice.

No comments:

Post a Comment